New Amphitheater Proposal Threatens Riverfront’s Environment

When I moved to Richmond in the early nineties, it was a much different place. My parents begged me to live outside of the national murder capital, but I was interested in the original, post punk music scene that had emerged here. Midtown Grace Street nightclubs had formed a nucleus where you could walk and see, for a five dollar cover or two, up and coming local and natural bands. Over time, through A.B.C. raids and VCU ‘redevelopment’, this promising scene was split up and done away with. I could lament how big venues with big admission taxes and ticket overages are a poor substitute, but I would be digressing… and I don’t want to live too much in the past…(I do still enjoy walking down to The Camel and local breweries to catch some acts these days).

The other thing that really attracted me to Richmond was how nature was reclaiming space in the city. It was green everywhere- with trees growing on the roofs of abandoned warehouses and just about everywhere else. The formerly industrial riverfront was a highway for all sorts of creatures that were recovering from a history of pollution. Birds were coming back, including migratory birds like purple martins. With a little bravery, folks were swimming with the fish in the James River again. It was beautiful to explore and play in these places, land that time had forgot, at least for a while.

Oregon Hill, with its access to the riverfront, James River Park, and Hollywood Cemetery has been a great neighborhood for nature lovers. In the early nineties, when the City was just about abandoned by white flight, Oregon Hill was almost rustic, with large gaps where old houses had been demolished and VCU had not yet been able to encroach. Deer would come into the alleys via the river, and whole families of possum and raccoon would coexist with humans and their pets. No one expects those conditions to return, at least to that degree.

Of course, the neighborhood welcomed new, sensitive, infill housing, and the Oregon Hill Home Improvement Council worked to ensure that some of it was truly affordable housing. Firework shows and Hollywood Cemetery ceremonial cannon fire would sometimes scare off birds and other wildlife (hopefully we are getting away from those things), but, thankfully, overall nature continued to come back to Belle Island and other parts of the riverfront. Citizens worked with City government to put environmental easements in place. Old trails were brought back to life and more discussion of re-watering the historic canal system came forward. Yes, Brown’s Island and Mayo Island are hosting concerts, but they are somewhat localized to specific areas that were designated for more human activity a while ago. The well-loved Folk Festival and RiverRock as weekend festivals are intrusive but temporary.

Unfortunately, here we are in the 2020’s, and it looks like Richmond is taking a step backward in regard to its environment by insisting on a new amphitheater on its riverfront. A lot of Richmonders don’t get it. The area has already seen so many trees removed, at Monroe Park, at ‘Tredegar Green’, and even in and around the Tredegar Iron Works parking lots. Social activists talk about ‘heat islands’ (which myself and others have been bringing up for decades), but shy away from pointing to perpetuators.

Now, Oregon Hill residents know the grass field where the amphitheater is proposed is not a pristine nature preserve, and never has been (neither is Belle Island, for that matter, which has a history as a prisoner-of-war camp as well as industrial activity before it was a naturalistic park). Right now, these ‘corporate green’ places at least do not get that much regular human activity and animals do use them too. It will be sad to lose the space, period, though we all know ‘the Ethyl fields’ will eventually get developed. But, more importantly, if it is a giant concert facility, pointed directly upriver, it will have a huge impact on birds and wildlife with lots of noise, lights, and human activity. An amphitheater is a particularly harmful use. It will impact Belle Island, Hollywood Cemetery, and James River Park also. These contiguous natural, semi-natural places are very important at that part of the river, especially for migratory birds.

This editorial will probably get ignored and frowned upon by ‘popular opinion’ (that’s alright, I don’t write these things to be popular). The ‘Big Green’ environmental groups are most likely cowed and have no interest in challenging this ‘already zoned’ and ‘ready to build’ project. I don’t expect City Council’s toothless Green Commission or laughable Sustainability Department to do much either. As with the Grace Street music scene, what is organic, truly unique, and ‘grass-roots’ will most likely lose to the corporate power and greed. This is seen as ‘progress’ in Richmond, and I am sure it is as purposeful as Richmond300’s forced land use changes on Oregon Hill. But as with Oregon Hill’s historic streetscapes, once we lose these things, they are likely gone forever.

So what, some say, we want even more large concerts (never mind all the existing and new performance spaces around Richmond, never mind the Coliseum, which is scheduled for demolition) on the river. Some write jealously that its time for Oregon Hill residents to give up ‘their oasis in the city’.

You know what ‘oasis’ means? Although the literal meaning of oasis is “a green spot in the desert,” it can also be used to describe a peaceful area in our everyday lives. It’s obvious they don’t care about peace for Oregon Hill residents or birds and wildlife. (If I sound like a tree-hugger writing that, so be it.). And they still don’t see the big picture.

U.S. and Canadian researchers have repeatedly reported that, since the 1970s, the continent has lost 3 billion birds, nearly 30% of the total, and even common birds such as sparrows and blackbirds are in decline. Despite efforts against pollution, the loss of habitat and overall of human activity continue the decline of birds and wildlife. And while many humans ignore the reality, scientists warn that birds and other creatures are vital for the ecosystem that humans depend upon. In other words, along with climate change, the loss of other species may lead to the eventual extinction of humans too. Of course there are other river areas where there are still birds and wildlife, but natural settings in downtown Richmond, at the falls of the James River, may be especially pivotal in the future of our environment. Perhaps the birds are doomed anyway, as the longterm impact of wifi and 5G are still being argued about even as they are being implemented, but if these and other human factors are impacting birds, can we at least do more to try to make space and refuge for those that are left? Or is building ANOTHER outdoor amphitheater really that necessary?

I will also say this – if Corin Capshaw and his music cohorts think any monetary donations to environmental groups makes this palatable, they are barking up the wrong tree. I would urge him and others to take a long look at who he is doing business with. While Richmond has an infamous ‘business history’ of exporting harm and death (slavery and cigarettes, to name the big ones), the callous NewMarket Corporation comes from a particular lineage that has global reach in environmental poisoning, and has worked tirelessly to cover it up. Regardless, time will tell on them.

‘Richmond300’ Amendment For Oregon Hill At City Council

If you don’t know the background, you may want to read previous posts here and here.

Remember that City Council passed the ‘Richmond300’ plan over a year ago, during the holidays when most people were pre-occupied with family matters, in a pandemic emergency, during which the Virginia Attorney General called on municipalities to suspend all non-life-threatening business, and specifically land-use issues.

Also remember that City Council voted for this despite opposition from many different parts of the City, but especially from this neighborhood, which has taken part in the process from the beginning, put up with bad online ‘presentations’, and has consistently asked for changes in the plan.

Most importantly, remember City Council passed it with the promise to amend it.

Some neighbor’s statements:

http://richmondfreepress.com/news/2020/nov/05/oregon-hill-neighborhood-open-speculation-destruct/

https://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/opinion-let-us-succeed/Content?oid=16786088

Now, here we are in 2022, and Councilperson Lynch has put language in anan amendment resolution before City Council, on the agenda for this coming Monday meeting.

It may decide on whether this historic neighborhood survives in the long term.

The City administration promised that it would be easy to amend the Richmond 300 master plan, and it is important for the city to keep this promise! The Richmond 300 committee ignored the request of the Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association and our City Councilor Stephanie Lynch that Oregon Hill be designated with a RESIDENTIAL future land use designation.

RESIDENTIAL future land use conforms to Oregon Hill’s current R-7 zoning that we fought hard to achieve. The Mixed-Use designation would undermine our R-7 zoning because an aim of the master plan aims to change zoning to match the future land use designation.
RESIDENTIAL future land use designation matches the function of 99% of the homes within our R-7 zoning and is consistent with the function of the dense historic neighborhood.
RESIDENTIAL future land use designation has a 1-3 story height limit that conforms to the R-7 zoning with a 35′ height limit, while the Mixed-Use designation has a much higher height limit of 2-4 stories and even higher on major streets like Idlewood and Laurel.
RESIDENTIAL future land use designation would encourage Special Use Permit applications to conform the existing R-7 zoning.
RESIDENTIAL future land use designation was approved for our sister neighborhood in Randolph, with which Oregon Hill has much in common.
RESIDENTIAL future land use designation promotes a cohesive neighborhood of families living in Oregon Hill, while the taller Mixed-Use designation would encourage developers to demolish Oregon Hill homes for dormitories for students at the adjacent Virginia Commonwealth University.
RESIDENTIAL future land use designation does not discourage the adaptive re-use of corner storefronts which have always been encouraged in Oregon Hill.

It’s also worth noting that there is no question that renovating and retrofitting a building has significantly lower upfront carbon emissions than demolishing and replacing a building. Oregon Hill residents who have worked hard for historic preservation over decades are fully supported by environmental reasoning.

City Council meets at 6 pm, on the second floor, at City Hall, 900 E. Broad St.

RCV And Climate Action At City Council Tonight

In addition to ranked choice voting, City Council will be discussing budget tonight…

RVA Clean Energy and Climate Justice Budget Recommendations

Richmond’s proposed FY2023 budget is at odds with the Climate and Ecological Emergency resolution that the city unanimously passed just 6 months ago and with the city’s commitment to equity and justice. Climate change is not listed as a priority in the introduction, and the budget takes no meaningful steps to mitigate heat island effects or tree inequity impacts, nor does it offer solutions to reduce emissions, or phase out the city’s reliance on fossil gas.

For more details on these budget recommendations see the FY2023 Proposed Budget – Fossil Gas and Electrification Highlights document.

FACILITIES
Facilities account for 45% of the City Government’s emissions. The City should immediately deploy energy efficiency upgrades, heat pumps, and renewables, while creating a clean energy and resiliency plan to power all government facilities with 100% renewables and batteries and replace all fossil fuel heating with efficient heat pumps.
Deploy energy efficiency upgrades citywide to minimize the energy needed for heating and cooling
Replace all fossil fuel heating, cooling, and water heaters with efficient heat pumps
Put solar + batteries on all eligible facilities getting a new roof
Put solar + batteries in all locations in need of a new generator
Replace all end of life HVAC equipment (boilers, furnaces, chillers, A/C) with modern air source heat pumps

RICHMOND GAS WORKS
The City Council’s Climate and Ecological Emergency Resolution calls for “an equitable plan to phase out reliance on gas and shift to accelerated investment in City-owned renewable energy” and “recognizes that the continued operation of the City’s gas utility is an obstacle to the City’s goal of Net-Zero emissions in accordance with Resolution No. 2020-R024.” Although there is state legislation pending (HB1257) that could limit the City’s actions regarding Richmond Gas Works (RGW), the following recommendations would still be permissible and would result in greater transparency into the operations of RGW. A robust board or commission charged with oversight of the RGW would benefit City Council (and the public) in making informed decisions regarding the transition of the RGW to a sustainable energy utility. For example, fossil gas leaks from aging infrastructure are a serious health and safety risk, as well as a lost gas expense that has not been adequately addressed.
Additionally, if the City, state and our country are serious about meeting the 45% in GHG emissions by 2030 and net-zero by 2050, the city should be concerned about the cost to ratepayers and the City of stranded assets if RGW continues to make major capital investments beyond basic maintenance. An oversight board or commission could stay abreast of best practices being implemented by fossil gas utilities around the country and provide the City Administration and Council with better information and options in the necessary transition away from reliance on fossil gas.
Establish more effective oversight of RGW
Explore how RGW can help residents, particularly low-income and underserved populations, electrify and weatherize their homes through various investments (such as neighborhood electrification) and financing mechanisms (such as on bill financing)
Analyze how the total lifecycle costs of electrification for households compares with rising fossil gas costs, and how rising fossil gas costs affect energy insecurity
Enable a just transition for workers at RGW
Repair all leaks while minimizing maintenance
Stop extending pipelines and other gas infrastructure
Holistically account for the cost of emissions and health effects of fossil gas combustion on air pollution inside and outside the home
Explore converting the utility into a sustainable energy utility to align the utility with the City’s emissions, health, and equity goals
Health Note: One of the clearest signals emerging in the scientific literature is the connection between cooking with gas and childhood asthma—a disease suffered by people of color and lower-income groups at much higher rates than the rest of the population. Children exposed to higher levels of indoor NO2 had an elevated risk of respiratory illness.

OFFICE OF SUSTAINABILITY
Establish effective Key Performance Indicators and mandate all agencies integrate these KPIs into their planning and budgeting processes.
50% renewable energy by 2023 and 100% by 2025 (as the Mayor promised in his 2021 State of the City address)
% of City government energy use powered by on-site renewables
% of fossil fuel HVAC infrastructure replaced
% of fossil fuel generators replaced
% of City fleet replaced with electric or renewable powered vehicles and bicycles

FLEET
As a part of the City’s plan to address the climate emergency, the City should transition to all electric vehicles (EV).
Create a plan to transition to all electric vehicles
Build charging infrastructure for the city’s EV fleet
Make purchases based on total lifecycle costs to account for fuel cost
Purchase EVs or ebikes for the budgeted 97 new Police Department cruisers (a number of cities are using Tesla 3s, VW id4s, and Kia Niros as police vehicles)
Purchase electric vehicles or fire trucks for the budgeted 5 new Fire Department vehicles
Purchase or subscribe to electric school buses to avoid the health risks of diesel fumes on children’s health

URBAN FOREST
Reinstate the Urban Forestry Commission to provide guidance and support for the city to maintain and enhance tree populations with the goal of improving the urban environment. Responsibilities include updating the city’s tree ordinance, reviewing remediation policies, and educating the public on urban forests.
Fund two new positions in the Urban Forestry Division, including an Urban Forester position. The urban forester will lead the creation of an Urban Forest Master Plan, including a roadmap for how the City of Richmond will achieve the 60% canopy goal set in the Richmond 300 Master Plan.
Develop an Urban Forestry Master Plan to increase citywide tree canopy cover to at least 60%. The strategic plan will protect and expand tree resources with desired outcomes of the community and incorporate the RVAgreen2050 plan, RVAH20 objectives and priorities outlined in the city’s Equity Agenda.
Increase funding for tree maintenance and watering to ensure trees can grow to maturity, provide maximum ecological services and improve public safety.
Triple the budget for contract work so Richmond can scale up tree operations for tree planting, care and maintenance.
Increase the city’s planting budget to achieve canopy goals set in Richmond 300 Master plan and account for outdated fee structure within the Adopt-A-Tree program.
Expand the Adopt-A-Tree program for community organizations to buy trees in bulk and commit to steward the trees.
In addition, we recommend that the Department of Parks and Recreation fund it’s community gardening program, Richmond Grows Gardens (250k) yearly for food justice, nutrition education and climate resiliency programming.
The Department of Public Works and/or DPU fund community engaged, Stormwater BMPs in formerly redlined neighborhoods within public green space in South Richmond. (500k) yearly.
The Office of Community Wealth Building with the Department of Social Services (SNAPET & TANF) fund community urban agriculture and solar power installation training and ad workforce development in formerly redlined neighborhoods in South Richmond. (250k)

FUNDING SOURCES
The federal government has numerous grant and loan programs to subsidize electrification and decarbonization. Richmond should make full use of these resources to meet our emissions, health, and equity goals as well as provide responsible fiscal stewardship of City resources.
US DOE: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant program was refunded by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) with $550 million, 68% of which can be directly distributed to cities and counties to improve energy efficiency and invest in renewable energy.
US DOT: BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant: Includes integrated electric fleet, electrified transit, and charging solutions
USDA: Community Facilities: Program to include microgrids, on-site renewable energy, electrification retrofits, and urban greening
US EPA: Brownfields grant and loan programs to include brightfields deployment and interconnection
US DOE: WAP and HHS: LIHEAP to prioritize upgrades that promote beneficial electrification.
Energy Cost Savings Assistance: Low-income residents can obtain $5,000-$25,000 worth of energy improvements on their homes. Funds come from Federal Weatherization, RGGI, and Dominion programs.
NFWF Small Watershed Grants: Funds available to assist the development of a health tree canopy, with grants up to $500K.
Virginia Environmental Endowment: Offers grants for water quality, land stewardship, and outreach.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund: Offers grants for projects with positive, tangible benefits to the Bay and the Bay program.
The Department of Forestry Urban and Community Forestry Grant Program: Encourages projects that promote the protection and enhancement of urban and community forest ecosystems, tree planting, the care of trees, and education on tree issues.
The Department of Forestry Trees for Clean Water Grant Program: Encourage the creation of long-term, sustained canopy cover to improve water-quality across the commonwealth.

THE FOLLOWING RICHMOND ORGANIZATIONS ENDORSE THE CLEAN ENERGY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS:
Center for Common Ground
Chesapeake Climate Action Network – Central Va
Citizens Climate Lobby – Richmond Chapter
Climate Changemakers
Divest RVA
Ellwood Thompson’s Local Market
Extinction Rebellion – Richmond
Friends of Rattlesnake Creek
Green New Deal Virginia
Groundwork RVA
Happily Natural Day
Partnership for Smarter Growth
Richmond Teachers For Climate Justice
Richmond Tree Stewards
RVA Interfaith Climate Justice League
Sierra Club, Falls of the James Group
Southside Releaf
Sunrise Richmond
Sunrise Virginia
The Climate Mobilization
Th!rd Act
Virginia Clinicians for Climate Action
Virginia Interfaith Power and Light

Dominion and Government Ignore Citizens On Solar


Dominion is implementing solar on the roof of it’s riverfront parking garage this week after staging materials last week. Though some solar advocates cheer, it deserves more scrutiny.

While there is widespread support for solar in the neighborhood and elsewhere, this installation comes after repeated complaints that it will block more of the historic public view of the James River from Oregon Hill. And in the big picture it is part of a disturbing pattern from Dominion and the City.
That Dominion is ignoring neighborhood residents should come as no surprise. The company has a history of deception and betrayal. In 1999-2000, Dominion and the neighborhood were in bitter contention over plans to build a high rise office complex on the riverfront. The neighborhood worked with outside groups to try to hold Dominion more accountable, even though City Council and Planning Commission notably did not. Ancient history, maybe, but note that Dominion still clings to its City-given legal right to build something taller.
In pushing themselves onto to the riverfront location, approval was given in part because they promised to move their operations center with “hundreds of jobs” from the county to Tredegar Street. But of course they lied and that did not happen.
And in the process of trying to smooth things over, Dominion met with different community representatives about riverfront plans. At the time, traffic was brought up as a chief concern, and Dominion assured City Council that existing roadways could serve the additional traffic created by its development. They lied again. Ten years later, Dominion insisted on a new road while at the same time saying it had no plans for new development “at this time.” And then came Venture Richmond’s push for an amphitheater. It was very sad to see Richmond’s historic riverfront get this corporate driveway treatment. Many trees were cut down and wildlife displaced, and the historic canal was again cut into. When this new road was proposed, Oregon Hill residents suggested extending Spring Street to 5th Street instead. They were ignored.

Getting back to solar and the present day, it’s very important to note that when Dominion did build its complex on the riverfront, the architects created a huge, south-facing, sloping roof for it’s ‘Enron-like’ energy-trading floor FOR solar. PV panels could be put flush to that roof and have little to no impact on the historic river view from Oregon Hill. Despite this long-existing option, Dominion is building more height on top of its parking garage. Once again, Dominion purposely ignores citizens and alternatives.

So what, some solar advocates say. They don’t care about this historic neighborhood or even the riverfront. So what if this parking garage array is mostly a prop for the Dominion executives and politicians to point to during protests, it’s still more solar.
Maybe, but consider that, above all, this is more energy that Dominion OWNS, not the government, and certainly not citizens.

Case in point- the City’s Department of Public Utilities is beginning to re-roof the Byrd Park reservoir. Planned for many years, this project is a perfect opportunity for the City to make its own investment in renewable energy by copying what other localities all over the world have done and add solar to the new reservoir roof. The energy produced there could be invaluable for emergency/disaster recovery operations. Citizens have asked for it. The Byrd Park Civic Association asked for it. Yet there is NO mention of solar whatsoever in the planning. When our previous Councilperson, Parker Agelasto, asked for it years ago, the DPU head at that time (now PROMOTED by Stoney’s administration) deflected by saying it would violate agreements with Dominion.

Certainly, there are other examples where ‘muni-solar’ opportunities been discouraged and stomped on by Dominon. More ‘solar schools’ was one of the goals of the ‘Put Schools First’ movement– remember how the previous Dominion C.E.O. suddenly inserted himself in school board politics? Now, instead of fixing up old schools (and adding solar!), the local corporate media tells us that City Council and School Board are too busy fighting over the building of a NEW George Wythe High School.

Let’s look at the statewide level. Recently, Aaron Sutch, the Virginia program director for Solar United Neighbors, highlighted Dominion’s “bogus arguments” in regard to state policy and solar OWNED by communities and citizens. Even when ‘big box’ out-of-state corporations have asked to ‘go solar’ in Virginia, Dominion has discouraged it. It’s reprehensible given the opportunities. Coming back to local, recognize that Stone Brewing continues to expand here but does not ‘go solar’ here, despite having lots of solar at its California facilities. They know that Dominion and government discourages it. Dominion overall does not want distributed rooftop solar, they would rather have ‘utility-sized’ solar that THEY CONTROL installed as Virginians argue about ‘solar farms’.

The point is that Dominion will continue to pretend to ‘go solar’ while ignoring citizen and neighborhood concerns and doing all it can to discourage anyone else from competing with them for energy production. Indeed, this is why Dominion took over so much of Richmond’s riverfront in the first place. Government, captured by corporate money, will not stand in Dominion’s way. This is detrimental to not just Virginia citizens, but for humanity, as we face more climate change.

On Ukraine

Oregon Hill joins the world in mourning the tragedy and destruction of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. There has not been a neighborhood vote or anything, but I am confident neighbors would rightly condemn Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attack on Ukraine as an act of aggression and a violation of international law.

That said, there needs to be more editorial on what lead to this horrible moment in history. Before that though, the standard disclaimer- this editorial, and indeed, this site, does not portend to represent ALL of Oregon Hill residents’ opinion.

Certainly, the following editorial view is not being addressed by the corporate media- not nationally or locally, and probably does not represent the majority of popular American opinion either- but it needs to be expressed- President Biden is wrong when he declares the Russian invasion ‘unprovoked’.

Biden and other media and government leaders do themselves no favors when try to obscure the American involvement and actions preceding the Russian invasion.

In the years following the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Warsaw Pact, and despite previous promises to not do so, America has pushed a policy of NATO expansionism that has alarmed and angered Russia. Despite many warnings from foreign policy experts, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were added to NATO in 1999, with Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia following in 2004. In a December 2021 speech to his top military officials, Putin expressed his concerns about Ukraine in particular:

Over the past few years, military contingents of NATO countries have been almost constantly present on Ukrainian territory under the pretext of exercises. The Ukrainian troop control system has already been integrated into NATO. This means that NATO headquarters can issue direct commands to the Ukrainian armed forces, even to their separate units and squads….
Kiev has long proclaimed a strategic course on joining NATO. Indeed, each country is entitled to pick its own security system and enter into military alliances. There would be no problem with that, if it were not for one “but.” International documents expressly stipulate the principle of equal and indivisible security, which includes obligations not to strengthen one’s own security at the expense of the security of other states….
In other words, the choice of pathways towards ensuring security should not pose a threat to other states, whereas Ukraine joining NATO is a direct threat to Russia’s security.

Now, Putin is a murderous thug with a reputation for executing journalists that criticize him, but he is also valued by many Russians as a ‘strongman’ who has rehabilitated Russia’s stature in the world since Yeltsin. Having him with a nuclear button is terrifying as he would be a real ‘cold fish’ pushing it. We can only hope that his love of country and self-preservation would prevent him from doing so. You trap a bear in a cave and it will lash out. Why has the U.S. embarked on this dangerous course and brought Ukraine along with it?

And in particular in the Ukraine (the name means ‘borderlands’), there is a very sordid C.I.A. track record of arming neo-Nazi militia. This is NOT to say that all Ukranians are fascists, but this element has been tolerated and even encouraged to fight Russians. Thankfully, local activist Phil Wilyato has done a very good job of reporting on this aspect in the Richmond Defender newspaper and elsewhere. Still, how many Americans really know about this? Because we can be sure that many Russians are aware of it on their border.

But the real problem is that the Biden administration seems to be supporting if not continuing a policy of regime change. In January, it appointed Victoria Nuland to the position of under secretary of state for political affairs at the State Department. Nuland was a key member of the Bush administration who advocated tirelessly for interventionism in Afghanistan and Iraq and later joined the Obama administration and advocated tirelessly for interventionism in Libya and Syria. (We will see if the Ukraine refugee crisis surpasses the Libyan one, biggest since World War II.) But Nuland became especially infamous in her post as assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, where she helped orchestrate a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

Most Americans don’t know the story of the right wing Maidan Coup, which many U.S. mainstream media outlets did not cover. This essentially gave Putin the opening he needed to have Russia illegally annex Crimea from Ukraine and was a major event that lead to the current war.

As stated above, none of these things excuse or justify Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, but they definitely represent American provocation. The question is what comes next? Is Biden’s plan to push ‘regime change’ policies on Russia, a nuclear power? This risks WWIII. Sadly, Ukraine’s immediate future is that of a battlefield, unless cooler heads prevail. Negotiating for Ukraine’s permanent neutrality is a real option, but it may be lost in a fog of war.

Also sadly, any real political conversation on this topic, in the U.S. at least, will likely be drowned out by the same neo-McCarthyism and smearing that we saw during Russiagate, with racist conman Trump and his Russian thug friend Putin used as foils for triangulation. The ruling Democratic Party continues to punch left while joining the rest of the country in drifting to the right. In the process of all this, America will probably squander windows of opportunity for a new course and foreign policy.

At the same time, to end on a brighter note, America and Europe have new incentives to reform energy policy and move more quickly towards renewable energy. From the executive director of the Electrification Coalition:

“Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine is a devastating crisis whose impacts are being felt around the world.
“This conflict is the latest example of the inextricable links between our energy systems and our national security, and it vividly demonstrates the human and economic costs of powering transportation with fossil fuels. In 2020, Russia was the world’s third-largest producer of petroleum. The U.S. transportation sector’s overwhelming dependence on volatile global oil markets – and the unreliable actors who influence them – is a direct threat to the interests of the United States and our allies.
“Widespread adoption of EVs is the best scalable strategy to loosen oil’s grip on our national security and our economic prosperity. As the price of gasoline rises, with impacts felt most acutely by those who are most vulnerable, it is time for bipartisan leadership to accelerate the arrival of a transportation future that is domestically powered and stably priced.
“The Biden administration has taken important steps to support the electrification of our transportation sector, including enactment of the historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which includes unprecedented levels of funding for EV charging infrastructure and electric school buses, and executive orders to electrify the federal fleet and increase EVs’ share of total vehicles sold in the United States. And the president reiterated the administration’s commitment to EVs in last week’s State of the Union address.
“We applaud the administration for its leadership on transportation electrification, and we will continue to partner with national policymakers on steps forward to reduce our transportation system’s reliance on oil. Much more work remains to be done to free ourselves from the harms petroleum dependence inflicts on the American people, our national security, economic prosperity, manufacturing leadership, public health, and climate.
“It is critical that we come together now to accelerate widespread EV adoption. This is a moment like no other, and our leaders must waste no time seizing it.”

Editorial: Don’t Miss This Opportunity

Last month, the Eurasia Group Foundation released a report entitled “Inflection Point: Americans’ Foreign Policy Views After Afghanistan”. Here is the Executive Summary:

On August 30, 2021, the last US soldier evacuated Afghanistan, ending the longest war in American history. The withdrawal elicited disapproval from the professional foreign policy community, who expressed dismay and distress over the future of America’s global role. The public debate sparked by the withdrawal is an important and perhaps long overdue one. So the results of our fourth annual survey of Americans’ foreign policy views arrives at an opportune moment. Here are some of the key observations, which will hopefully inform this debate:
Americans want the US to be engaged diplomatically in the world
Nearly three times as many Americans – 58 percent vs. 21 percent – want to increase as decrease diplomatic engagement with the world;
A plurality of Americans fit a “Global Ambassadors” type. They support active diplomacy but oppose increasing America’s troop presence worldwide;
When asked to rank the forms of international assistance they think the United States should prioritize, the most popular types were non-military: (1) humanitarian aid and disaster relief, and (2) COVID-19 relief such as vaccine donations;
Sixty-three percent support reviving nuclear negotiations with Iran and pursuing an agreement which prevents the development of nuclear weapons;
But they also want to scale back America’s military posture and activities
Most (62 percent) think the biggest lesson from the war in Afghanistan was that the United States should not be in the business of nation-building or that it should only send troops into harm’s way if vital national interests are threatened;
A plurality wants to decrease the number of US troops stationed overseas and reduce security commitments to countries in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East;
Support for United States-led military intervention to stop human rights abuses decreased by 14 percent between 2020 and 2021; (and support for the United Nations taking the lead increased by 14 percent);
In recent years, Congress has largely ceded its war-making prerogative to the executive branch. 76 percent believe the president should seek Congressional approval before ordering military action;
Seventy percent believe “the US should negotiate directly with adversaries to try to avoid military confrontation, even if those adversaries are human rights abusers, dictators, or home to terrorist organizations;”
Americans generally make a positive appraisal of drone strikes: nearly 70 percent believe they are less costly than sending US troops into combat, or are an effective tool in depriving terrorists of safe havens in remote parts of the world;
In part because they want to redirect resources to domestic priorities
Twice as many Americans want to decrease the defense budget as increase it. The most cited rationale for decreasing the defense budget is a desire to redirect resources domestically;
Half of Americans have a “Jeffersonian” outlook: they are more eager to protect democracy at home than promote it abroad. This outlook increased by 35 percent since 2018;
Though there is little consensus around how to address other great powers
The number of respondents who think the United States should act militarily to prevent Russian troops from invading a NATO ally decreased by six percentage points between 2020 and 2021, and Americans are divided down the middle on this issue;
For the second year in a row, Americans are evenly split on whether the United States should increase or decrease its troop presence in Asia;
​​While a slight plurality of respondents believe the United States should militarily defend Taiwan, Americans appear ambivalent on the issue: 40 percent are unsure about what the United States should do in the case of a Chinese invasion;
Younger Americans (18 to 29 year-olds) are especially weary of war
Eighty percent believe that unless the United States is under attack, the president should be required to seek approval from Congress before ordering military action overseas;
Nearly two-thirds believe the United States should respond to China’s rise by decreasing the US troop presence in Asia, a seven percent increase from last year;
Of all age groups surveyed, young Americans are the most likely to believe the United States is “not an exceptional nation” (60 percent) and least likely to believe it is “exceptional because of what it has done for the world” (12 percent);
Nearly 60 percent are critical of the use of drones, more than twice as many as the older age groups;
Five times as many want to decrease as increase current levels of defense spending.

Meanwhile, what are America’s leaders doing? Last week, the House of Representatives voted to expand the mandatory age-18 Selective Service registration to include women, as part of an annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which at $778 billion this year gave President Joe Biden $24 billion more than he asked for.

Neither this report or the ‘doubling of the draft’ got that much attention by the corporate media, but Americans should be questioning why their elected leaders are ignoring public opinion.

The twenty-year-long Afghan war cost this country trillions of dollars and thousands of lives. The opportunity costs are stupefying. This is a moment when the country could significantly change direction away from war funding and waging ‘endless war’. This could be a new path. Don’t miss this opportunity.

King Asks Governor To Reject Mayor’s Plea Without Water Rate Reform

Dear Ralph,

I have become aware that the City of Richmond Mayor Stoney is begging for more assistance from the state of Virginia in regard to the city’s utility budget. His letter, dated July 7 and signed by the nine Democratic Party members of Richmond’s delegation to the General Assembly, asks for money to pay for improvements to Richmond’s sewer system from the influx of $4.3 billion the state is to receive from the federal American Rescue Plan. Now, normally, as a king, I loathe interjecting in matters between your state and and the city or bothersome party politics, just as I know that you, as a state official, do not wish to become too involved in local city matters. That said, two things are causing this exception from normal – one, the amount of American money requested, $833 million, is rather large and meaningful; and, two, I am personally offended by how the City uses its water utility to take advantage of its own citizens, especially its most impoverished. Therefore, as the King of Oregon Hill, I am writing to ask that you give Mayor Stoney’s request more scrutiny, and perhaps even rejecting his plea altogether until certain considerations are met.

As you are already aware, the City of Richmond as well as your Commonwealth of Virginia overall, are very blessed with a plenitude of water, especially in comparison to western American states. In the past, city officials have taken this natural blessing for granted and used it to help wash away the city’s wastes, and consequently polluted the James River. Sewer overflow, as citizens have come to know it, is rightly seen far and wide as a large, embarrassing, decades-old problem that must be corrected. I give that environmental effort my royal benediction. If I felt that this matter was all this was about, I would leave this to yourself and others to freely administer.

But City officials over time abused the water wealth in other ways, and have unwisely become dependent on unfairly bilking their own constituents. I point to four problematic practices –
1) A payment line (I believe the bureaucrats refer to it as a PILOT) in the citizens’ water bills that goes straight to the City’s general fund, money that has not necessarily gone to paying for water/sewer or anything other than padding the City’s budget. The city’s PILOT surcharge on water includes a reprehensible payment in lieu of federal income tax. I will note that Paul Goldman, former chairperson of the Democratic Party of Virginia, has also called attention to this ‘rip-off’ of Richmond citizens (sans lawsuit, so far…).
2) Bad water agreements with the surrounding counties that sell the the City’s water at low, wholesale prices. Indeed, the City is charging it’s own citizens more for the water than the counties are charging theirs for the water their governments are buying from the City. These low prices for this valuable natural resource are encouraging an even more horrible waste through growing suburban sprawl in the counties, which in turn is polluting the James River even more.
3) High minimum water rates for residents. At one point in the past, the local Green Party ran a contest that would award anyone who could find a higher residential minimum water rate that was comparable to the City of Richmond’s anywhere else in the country- no one won (The City administration later lowered the rate just enough that the contest could not be run again). It is shameful that the City keeps crying poverty, creates whole public bureacracies devoted to ‘wealth building’, but still insists on high minimum rates which place an unfair burden on its poorest residents for what is a basic human need. I have heard one wealthy white resident defend this longtime practice as a way “to claw back some of the money that spent on public housing’ (for black residents).
4) The overall utility and water situation favors large corporations over residents. The utility rates in effect award large volume users while punishing poor residents. It discourages conservation. This is also reflected in other matters – for example, how Dominion Power company is allowed to release water from its coal ash ponds while discouraging other uses like micro hydropower on the James River. Again, it pains me to watch how the City not only weaponizes its water utility against its own residents, but squanders and abuses its natural blessing of water wealth. It is truly offensive and deserves repudiation.

It should be noted that citizens have tried to bring these problematic and unfair practices to the State Attorney’s attention, state representatives’ attention, the Mayor’s attention, to City Council’s attention, to the media’s attention, and to the larger populace’s attention, all with limited effect. Water rates have been brought up by mayoral and council candidates as a campaign issue, only to be forgotten or abandoned by those who win office. Reporters shrug their shoulders and tell me that Richmond uses its water utility in this manner to balance its budget, never mind how regressive it is and how it would make more sense to charge large volume users more instead of overcharging its poorest residents.

Ralph, it is widely reported that you and Terry regard Levar as a ‘rising star’ in your political party, but you should not be blind to what is important here – yes, the City needs money to repair its sewer system in order to help the environment- very much so. But keep in mind that the City has been using the sewer overflow problem as a reason to beg money from the federal and state governments for years and years. And while Richmond has undoubtedly realized many benefits from its CSO control program, the City is not doing as good as a job as it should in regard to stewarding it’s water wealth for the benefit of ALL of its citizens and the environment. And in the REAL big picture, these underlying issues will only deepen and become more exacerbated as climate change reduces the current water wealth. In your speeches, Governor, you talk about how Virginia needs to become more progressive and future-oriented. I contend Richmond’s backwardness must change in order for that to happen.

I cannot command, but I strongly recommend your office consider rejecting the Mayor’s plea until City officials, including the Mayor and City Council, publicly and sincerely promise to phase out the PILOT payment, renegotiate its county water agreements, and fully reform its utility water rate structure. Yes, the City desperately needs the money to correct the sewer overflow problem, but it must reform its water utility and water wealth management in order to have that money spent well.

While I do not have power over the Commonwealth of Virginia, I do claim sovereignty over Oregon Hill within the City of Richmond, and I feel it is my duty to look over the interests of citizens. I am hoping this letter will prevent future interventions.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Scott Burger
King of Oregon Hill

Tree Equity

In a new post on Treehugger.com, entitled “Communities of Color Have Fewer Trees—This ‘Tree Equity’ Score Wants to Change That”, the City of Richmond is mentioned as a partner in this scoring endeavor.

We can be proud that Oregon Hill, despite being densely developed, scored an admirable 86 points. The score for Monroe Park and the surrounding VCU area is a measly 65.

This should come as no surprise. Neighbors have mentioned this before, even as VCU, the Science Museum, the Valentine Museum have all brought up the disparities in the context of ‘heat islands’ (of course, some Oregon Hill neighbors brought up locally the environmental heat island effects decades before, only to be scoffed at, before they came into vogue with the current social justice set). What these institutions refuse to address is how Monroe Park was purposefully and cruelly de-forested under the Monroe Park ‘Conservancy’ lease.

This is something that should be discussed more publicly, but doesn’t look like it will be with a current City Council that would rather have a desert in Monroe Park as long as the City skates on the cost of maintenance. Councilperson Lynch’s answers to recent inquiries about this are very disappointing- there is no sense of alarm or accountability.

On a more positive note, applications will open on July 1 to become a certified Richmond Tree Steward.

The application window will close Aug. 15 and they will notify successful applicants within a week. The $150 cost for the course must be paid before the first class.
Proof of COVID-19 vaccination will be required at the first meeting.

Here is the link: https://richmondtreestewards.org/support/become-a-tree-steward/