Category Archives: editorial

Solidarity With Assange

Posted on by
Reply

Julian Assange during a 2014 press conference attended by international media

On October 1, 2024, Julian Assange broke his silence. The WikiLeaks founder testified before the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) about the chilling effect his detention and conviction has had on human rights. When Assange was detained, The Committee previously found he met PACE’s definition of a political prisoner. Assange’s testimony marked his first substantive, public comments in over half a decade. Other than his remarks at his sentencing hearing, the public has largely not heard from Assange since his 2019 arrest.

For what it is worth, this ‘community news site’, even in its mostly ‘amateur’ status, declares its solidarity with Julian Assange. Hopefully, this site will not get targeted by the C.I.A. for doing so. It is more noteworthy and distressing that local ‘professional’ journalists have not done more to declare their solidarity.

It’s also an election year, and, incredibly, Donald Trump is running for re-election as President of the United States. What is sad and remarkable is that many citizens still don’t know or have forgotten that Assange revealed how Trump was made into a serious political candidate in the first place. The reality is that much of the ‘transnational repression’ we have seen from the U.S. government in regard to Assange is most likely not instigated from the WikiLeaks publication/documenting of U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, but from their revelations on the amount of triangulation involved in American politics.

It’s noteworthy that one of Oregon Hill’s previous Halloween parades (2013) was in honor of whistleblowers Assange, Manning, and Snowden.

When journalism is criminalized, as in Assange’s case, things get truly scary.

Mandatory Homework for Mayoral Candidates

Posted on by
Reply

Photo by Julia M Cameron via Pexels.

New school year, but you know the drill…

If you are a candidate for political office (state or City), and in particular a City mayoral candidate, please submit via official campaign email to info@oregonhill.net both a pledge (to defend the neighborhood from more VCU disrespect and encroachment, to recognize the demands already made to Richmond300 and the City of Richmond’s Planning Commission, and to do everything in your power to get VCU to make a written Memorandum of Understanding (aka MOU or commitment) to Oregon Hill, including but not limited to requesting a meeting with VCU Board of Visitors), but also a description of how you personally plan to defend and help this historic neighborhood if you win your election. In other words, what will you do to protect and defend, but also help and improve the Oregon Hill neighborhood.

This work will be accepted up to October 15. Late work will NOT be accepted. Grades will NOT be on a sliding scale.

By October 16, neighbors will know who NOT to vote for. We are looking for candidates who we CAN vote for. And make no mistake about it, Oregon Hill votes strongly and can be a deciding factor for the 5th District.

This comes at a time when the historic Oregon Hill district is under incredible pressure from developers (and let’s make no mistake about it, some of these people are little better than gangsters) and a new, corporate, riverfront amphitheater. Neighbors see the high-rise apartment buildings in Manchester and Scott’s Addition and don’t even recognize those neighborhoods anymore.

Neighbors are also watching the campaign contributions and making lists. Many of you may have taken part in the OHNA zoom meetings, but we know talk is cheap. Let’s see how your writing fares.

Historic preservationists have worked tirelessly to protect this small neighborhood’s historic streetscapes for decades. If you believe in historic preservation, now it is a good time to make the commitment.

“No Votes For Genocide VA”

Posted on by
Reply

This yard sign appeared on W.Cary Street.

From corresponding website:

Since the start of the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, residents have been demanding Richmond City Council call for an immediate ceasefire and acknowledge and divest all city funding tied to Israel. Citizens have been drafting resolutions, meeting with council members, and attending and speaking at countless biweekly public meetings.

Richmond City Councillors have refused to take action. Richmond’s Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan, and both Senator Tim Kaine and Senator Mark Warner, have also refused to take action to divest from Israel and protect Palestinian lives. They ignore our pleas and continue to send billions of dollars of military aid and weapons to Israel.

As Pennsylvania Congresswoman Summer Lee stated, “Opposing genocide is good politics and good policy.” It’s time to tell our representatives that actively opposing genocide is not only a moral imperative, but a political necessity.

We are joining the growing number of people across the United States working to send a clear message to all candidates and elected officials on local, state, and national levels who are unswayed by our appeals to their humanity – we will NOT support you while you continue to support genocide. #NoVotesForGenocide

It’s worth mentioning that according to recent polls, over two-thirds of voters want any administration to work towards a permanent ceasefire and de-escalation of conflict in Gaza. That goes along with last year’s “Banner of The Year”.

Editorial: Save Community Hospital!

Posted on by
1

Richmonders have become somewhat used to Oregon Hill residents protesting the VCU administration’s encroachment and demolition of more of the historic Oregon Hill neighborhood.

With no ‘memorandum of understanding’ with the neighborhood from the VCU Board of Visitors, (despite many requests), the Wayne Commission plan never repudiated, the ‘Richmond300’ and re-zoning breathing down the neighborhood’s neck, and a future amphitheater designed to blast residents off the hill, Oregon Hill still faces a number of existential threats.

But that is not the focus of this editorial.

Virginia Union University, a small but noteworthy HBCU (Historic Black College and University), is emerging from a period of financial uncertainty and moving ahead with its own ‘master plan’ for growth. And while much of that is worth celebrating, one aspect that many Richmond residents are objecting to is the scheduled demolition of the old Community Hospital in Church Hill. This building, where so many people were born and cared for, has incredible resonance for the African American community.

Appropriately, local Black media and Black leaders like Viola Baskerville are rallying with VUU alumni to create a groundswell of support for renovating and repurposing the building, instead of bulldozing it.

From the Richmond Free Press:

Clearly, the structure is more than just a building. In the early 1900s, the hospital was founded in Jackson Ward by Dr. Sarah Garland Jones and other Black doctors who weren’t allowed to work at white hospitals in Richmond. For many years, Richmond Community Hospital was the epicenter of care for black people in the city, especially during segregation.

The hospital moved to Overbrook Road in the 1930s and to its current location in Church Hill in 1980. In 1995, the doctors, who owned the hospital as part of a for-profit partnership, sold it to Bon Secours, according to news reports.

Dr. Jones, it should be noted, was the first Black person and first woman to be certified to practice medicine by the Virginia State Board of Medicine.

VUU, so far, in response, is taking a page from the callous VCU administration in promising to ‘memorialize’ Community Hospital while moving forward with demolition.

As shortsighted as it is for this historic Black college and university to destroy this significant part of Richmond’s Black history, there are additional reasons to change course.

Historic preservation is inherently a sustainable practice. Study after study have proven that preservation and reuse of historic buildings reduces resource and material consumption, puts less waste in landfills, and consumes less energy than demolishing buildings and constructing new ones.

Historic buildings, often energy efficient from inherent characteristics, can be upgraded with new technologies to maximize energy performance. Historic features such as windows can be repaired and restored for higher efficiency. In addition to saving existing resources and historic character, historic preservation means environmental, cultural and economic benefits for communities, something that Oregon Hill residents have championed over time.

This is where the City’s Sustainability Department could and should take a stand, and prove it’s doing more than tiptoeing around developers and corporations’ profit making. And, as has been noted here repeatedly, City and State officials have a sworn duty to protect historic landmarks, though in recent years they have increasingly turned their back to it. This is a chance for them to make some amends.

This is a good time for Oregon Hill residents and ALL Richmond citizens to join together and recognize and support this cause.

This Sunday, The Gary Flowers Show, on 101.3 FM & 990 AM, will address the current discussion around the old Richmond Community Hospital building. There is also a rally scheduled for 1 pm outside the abandoned Community Hospital building at 1209 Overbook Road (see photo above). But what might make even more of a difference is if citizens make a point to contact the Virginia Union administration and board and The Steinbridge Group developers (at info@steinbridge.com).

Animal Welfare

Posted on by
Reply

Many Richmond residents were horrified to learn that a famous deer who had been roaming in Hollywood Cemetery and the James River park system had been shot and poached this past month. The report even made it to the Washington Post newspaper.

This buck, with a nice big rack of antlers, was a welcome sign of riverfront wildlife and undoubtedly lead a whole herd.

It really was not so much about hunting in general so much as it was about what is supposed to be protected inside the City, where hunting is illegal. Some residents said that people should be more careful about posting photos and other information about wildlife, in case that inadvertently entices more criminals in the future. Over the years, that buck had made it into a lot of local photographs.

Given the amount of gunfire heard last night, enforcement may not seem that obvious, though the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources may also have more resources when it come to poaching than the Richmond Police Department has for illegal shooting.

This incident does beg the question- should the City try to hide remaining pockets of wildlife or celebrate and do more for them publicly?

Elsewhere in Virginia, the nation, and the world, more is being done to protect wildlife from traffic, with wildlife crossings, and noise, with more restrictions on human activity. The City of Richmond, on the other hand, under the rule of VCU and corporations, seems to be moving in the opposite direction. As expressed here earlier last year, the local PTB (Powers That Be) seem determined to blast this neighborhood, and its more natural surroundings, off the hill altogether with a new, unnecessary, outdoor amphitheater.

But dig a little, and the callousness towards nature and wildlife goes much deeper. Indeed, while the very sad story about ‘cemetery buck’ made local media rounds, some residents are wondering if another story should really be getting more attention- it’s to the Richmond Free Press and reporter Jeremy Lazarus’ credit that an article entitle ‘VCU’s rat de-bait’ appeared in that newspaper this past week (Full disclosure: I do some part-time technical work for the Richmond Free Press).

It comes as another outrage to the ravaged historic park- what was a wooded, Victorian park treasured by City residents has been expensively turned into, essentially, another VCU campus lawn in a long-involved ‘renovation’. It’s a depressing end for this place that some City residents had hoped could have become part of the ‘East Coast Greenway’.

But more pointedly, what the Richmond Free Press article did not get into, is that VCU’s costly, poisonous traps poise a great threat to local wildlife. The glyphosate floated by VCU in Monroe Park is substantial and also affects humans and important pollinators. Any poisoned squirrel or rat from the park can be picked up by hawks and owls, who will also die and spread the poison to the river or wherever they die.

We need local leaders and organizations who are not afraid of the VCU administration to call this poisoning for what it is- totally unacceptable, and demand an immediate halt.

Furthermore, the City needs to look at the big picture and come to terms about its commitment to animal welfare overall. Many residents want to live in a more biophilic city. Unfortunately, government already has a bad reputation for ignoring its human citizens and deferring to the corporate PTB instead.

‘Iron Blossom Music Festival’ Announcement = Neoliberal Privatization of Public Park

Posted on by
Reply

Local corporate media gushed over the announcement of a new festival to be held in late August at, of all places, Monroe Park.

But did not tackle one bit logistical questions, ticket prices, or what is essentially the neoliberal privatization of a PUBLIC park. No questions about where the money is coming from to hold the concert or where the proceeds are going.

For some older residents, this announcement recalls wistful days of (free) Bruce Springsteen concerts under the trees in the park, but this is no longer the wooded, historic, PUBLIC park that they remember. The City and VCU have made sure of that over the last ten years or so– taking down many trees, kicking out poor people, and turning it into a VCU quad.

Many Oregon Hill residents love and take part in music, but many are also beginning to realize what is happening to the City as poor people and wildlife are deliberately driven out. The great African musician Fela Kuti famously said that “Music is the weapon of the future”. Sadly, locally, it is increasingly being wielded by powerful interests against those who can’t readily defend themselves.

Oregon Hill Households Continue to Benefit From Robo-Call Fines

Posted on by
1

When we last checked in on Pine Street neighbor Will and his family three years ago, they were breathing a sigh of relief due to their new source of income- fines placed on robo-calling telemarketers and junk mailers.

Interviewing Will today, he admits not only that the fines helped him get through a rough time economically, perhaps even allowing them to stay in their small Oregon Hill house, but that he has seen some positive changes in their whole relationship with the economy.

“Before the local government enacted this legislation, I was personally feeling preyed upon. Here I was, struggling to keep the roof above our heads, and food on the table, and yet we were bombarded by postcards, letters, texts, and phone calls, trying to sell us insurance we could not afford, or offering to buy our house out from under us. And so many outright scammers too. It was depressing and stressful.

But since the legislation went in, we may still be dealing with rising taxes and costs, but we feel less hassled, less pressured and more in control of our lives. It may not seem like much to some people, but I finally feel like there is balance restored. We still sometimes get postcards and calls, but we just log them and report ’em, and eventually we get those small public settlement checks that help us considerably with managing day-to-day expenses. I have also noticed less fraud and scam calls.”

Again, these checks come from a public fund set up by the Consumer Protection Act, a law that addresses robocalling, Do Not Call Registry, email spam, and solicitation violations. With the 2018 addendum that includes fines for unsolicited direct marketing mailings, the fund as well as its payments have grown considerably.

“Again, I urge neighbors and Richmond residents to call and email their local representatives and get help joining the program, or, if they already are enrolled, thank their local representatives for the program and remind them how important it is, especially for low income folks like ourselves. Everyone who is aggravated by robo-calls and all of the automated solicitations should see the big picture.”

Unfortunately, the industry and corporations are not taking this lying down. They are increasing their political campaign donations, often relying on ‘dark money’ channels to force their agendas on courts and governments. They claim that these fines and regulations are violating their corporate ‘personhood’ rights to ‘free speech’.

That’s why, in addition to signing up for the robo-call settlement program, citizens should contact their City, state, and federal representatives and demand resolutions and laws for both the state and national constitutions that make it explicit that corporations are not people and money is not speech.

As Will says, we need to know our Councilperson, Mayor, General Assembly, and Congresspeople put citizens over corporations.

“Top Down” Planning Changes Threaten Neighborhood

Posted on by
1

From Laurel Street neighbor Charles Pool (editor’s note: posted with permission):

Hi All,

I attended the meeting at Binford last evening regarding the three proposed zoning changes, which would eliminate ANY minimum parking requirement for anything, and lower restrictions on short term rentals (like AirBNB’s) and auxillary dwellings.

Many have objected to these changes, which are “top down” from the Planning Commission and staff (rather than requested by the communities). As I pointed out in my comment, no civic association has considered what we need to improve our quality of like and decided that we need less parking and more short term rentals!

One change proposed by the Planning Director last evening was to require owner residency for short term rentals (like AirBNB’s) EXCEPT for MIXED USE zoned areas. And for those of us who have followed this closely, the Planning Commission refused to change Oregon Hill’s future land use designation from MIXED USE. The number one goal of the Richmond 300 was to change zoning to match the future land use designation, and the city has already started the wheels in motion to rezone the entire city to match the master plan.

I hope that we as a neighborhood can oppose this!

Thanks,

Charles