“…. some historical perspective on the current zoning”

Cherry Street neighbor Todd Woodson has written a short post for social media…

Regarding the disastrous “Code Refresh” and it’s harmful affect on Oregon Hill, let me give you some historical perspective on the current zoning and how it was achieved in 2002.
Before we were appropriately rezoned to R7, the majority of Oregon Hill was zoned R63, a moderate density zoning. The year was 2002. I was serving as president of the newly formed Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association and also as representative on the Near West Neighborhood Teams coalition- a wonderful, solid group of diverse community representatives, supported by the City. Our City’s excellent planning department, led by Director Mark Strickler, had put in countless hours working out an appropriate rezoning classification known as R7 for Oregon Hill. R7 was perfect because it encouraged the preservation of our historic single family homes while shunning large high rise apartment complexes. This was important because at the time, the overlook area was owned by Ethyl Corporation (now New Market- upon whose land now stands the Allianz Amphitheater). Ethyl had bought up all of the historic housing (listed on both Federal and State Registers of Historic Places) in the southern part of Oregon Hill and summarily demolished the homes in order to realize their grand investment opportunity. The problem is that the pending R7 zoning preserved single family and so jeopardized Ethyl’s scheme to allow a developer out of Texas to put up HUGE student apartment complexes, which would ruin the aesthetic of the neighborhood and overstress the infrastructure. The community solidly backed the R7 rezoning but for some unknown reason, that rezoning had stalled out as the student high rise plans were on the table. At the time, there was not a strong mayor system- we had a City Manager named Calvin Jamison, who had formerly been Human Resources Director for… ETHYL CORPORATION! At a neighborhood teams meeting, I questioned Jamison, in front of Near West community members as to what was holding up our rezoning and he responded he didn’t know of anything holding it back. The wonderful City planning department (at the time) was frustrated because they had put in so much work on a seriously good plan (R7) for Oregon Hill and it was going nowhere. I was at City hall a lot back then- trying to unblock the progress for our neighborhood. A young planner (who shall remain nameless) took me aside to a secluded area and told me to FOIA the minutes of a meeting with Calvin Jamison and his former employers on such and such a date. This planning hero had taken the minutes himself. Now, I had never heard of FOIA, which stands for the Virginia Freedom of Information Act but I did as he told me. Those minutes spelled it all out: the City Manager was holding up the rezoning until his pals could get their high rises built. A neighbor and lawyer David Gammino and I marched into a City Council meeting and called Jamison on his actions. City Council’s collective jaw dropped (at the time, there was much corruption in the City and two City Council members had been sent to prison for taking bribes from developers). Amazingly, our R7 soon came up for a vote and we were successful! A great developer named Steve Middleton stepped in and built the overlook as can be seen today- pretty much matching the rest of Oregon Hill!
Fast forward to today, when the City’s incompetent Planning Department led by DEVELOPER RODNEY POOLE, who has led the planning commission for over two decades, is trying to take away our R7 zoning to incentivize DEVELOPERS to come in, demolish historic, reasonably affordable and dense housing stock to build high rise student housing. History repeats itself.
I ask my dear community members to support our quest to keep our neighborhood intact and historic. The “Code Refresh” initiative needs to be completely scrapped and Poole and director Vonck replaced with competent people, determined to do what’s best for our community.
Thanks, Todd.

Historic Profile: Rev. Florence McCarthy – A Ministry of Controversy and Community Engagement

Rev. Florence McCarthy pastored Pine Street Baptist Church during the period of reconstruction in Richmond, VA, after the Civil War. He was controversial in his views on the equality of African Americans. The following is a brief biography that Rev. Turner shared:

Rev. Florance (Florence) McCarthy – A Ministry of
Controversy and Community Engagement
Early Life and Ministry Beginnings
1
Florance McCarthy (often spelled Florence McCarthy) was born in Richmond, Virginia on April 29, 1838 .
He was the son of Irish immigrant parents – his father, also named Florence, had settled in Richmond as a
merchant 2
. Raised in a Baptist family, the young McCarthy pursued both education and ministry from an
3
early age. In the late 1850s he moved to Tennessee to teach at Franklin Female College in Franklin, TN .
While in Franklin, McCarthy was ordained as a Baptist minister (in Franklin, on an unspecified date) and
even briefly pastored a local church there 1
. By the turn of the Civil War, he had returned to Virginia: just
1
before the war, McCarthy served as a pastor in Lexington, Virginia .
When the American Civil War erupted, McCarthy joined the Confederate Army as a chaplain. He was
attached to the Army of Northern Virginia, reportedly with the Thomas Artillery (sometimes called the
“Alleghany” Artillery) 3 1
. Letters he wrote during 1862–1865 describe his experiences in camp life
during the war 3
. While serving the Confederacy, McCarthy initially held strong secessionist views. In fact,
as one Virginia newspaper later recounted, “a few weeks [before]” the war’s end he “boldly proclaimed
4
the most extreme Southern doctrines and boasted of his services at the first battle of Manassas” .
This background made what followed even more striking.
Pastor of Pine Street Baptist Church (Richmond) in Reconstruction
At the close of the Civil War in 1865, Richmond lay in ruins and its churches were struggling to rebuild. Pine
Street Baptist Church – a congregation founded in 1855 in the working-class Oregon Hill neighborhood of
Richmond – was one such church 5
. Pine Street had been established as a mission church years earlier,
and its members endured the war’s hardships. In the summer of 1865, Rev. Florance McCarthy became the
pastor of Pine Street Baptist Church, marking the start of a tumultuous yet significant tenure. He was
appointed to this post under the auspices of the American Baptist Home Mission Society of New York (the
Northern Baptist mission board) 6
. Northern Baptists were beginning to send aid and personnel into the
post-war South, and McCarthy – despite his Confederate past – had reinvented himself as a “loyal” Unionist
minister willing to work with them. A Southern newspaper later noted with scorn that McCarthy’s “reward”
for currying favor with Northern Baptists was an appointment “at fifty dollars per month, as pastor of a
6
church on Oregon Hill”, i.e. Pine Street Baptist .
Church Life and Activities Under His Leadership
Under Rev. McCarthy’s leadership, Pine Street Baptist resumed regular worship and community ministries
amid the Reconstruction era. The church finally completed a permanent building on Pine Street (the
congregation had moved around Oregon Hill during the war) and remained at that site from 1882 onward
7
. In these early post-war years, Pine Street’s membership included many working-class Richmonders,
and possibly some African Americans who had been affiliated with the church before emancipation.
1
McCarthy’s pastorate focused on spiritual revival and also on outreach to the broader community. For
example, he cooperated with the Richmond Baptist City Mission in efforts like food relief and education
for the poor, a necessity in hungry post-war Richmond (though detailed records of specific programs at
Pine Street are scarce). We do know Pine Street hosted citywide Baptist gatherings; one such meeting in
April 1885 saw Pine Street welcoming a Baptist Sunday School Association conference 8
, indicating the
church’s active role in local Baptist life even years later.
However, McCarthy’s most notable activities were not confined to his pulpit. He became an outspoken
advocate on social issues, especially concerning the rights and welfare of African Americans in Richmond.
This was highly unusual – even shocking – for a white Southern Baptist pastor in 1865–1867. Richmond’s
black population, newly emancipated, was organizing their own churches and conventions, and McCarthy
chose to actively engage with them.
Advocacy for African American Equality and Community Involvement
Rev. McCarthy’s tenure at Pine Street coincided with the formative days of black Baptist autonomy in
Virginia. In August 1866, the Colored Baptist Convention met in Richmond (at Ebenezer Church) – one of
the first gatherings of African American Baptists in the state after emancipation. McCarthy attended as a
visitor and was invited to speak. What he said stunned the audience: he delivered an impassioned speech
in favor of racial equality and black suffrage 9 10
. He declared that a man’s color should make “no
difference in his social standing,” that he considered African Americans his “social and political equal,”
and he urged that black men must be allowed to vote 9
. McCarthy even proclaimed that as soon as
black suffrage was secured, he intended to run for public office in Virginia – effectively aligning himself
11
with the Radical Reconstruction cause .
This speech was, in effect, a bold call for racial justice. It made McCarthy an instant ally of the African
American community’s fight for equal rights. Many black delegates at the convention were reportedly
pleased by his words (though they reacted with quiet surprise rather than loud applause) 12
. In private,
after the session, a number of African Americans warmly thanked Dr. J. B. Jeter – a prominent white
minister who responded to McCarthy – indicating they respected moderate allies but were unsure how to
13
publicly support McCarthy’s radical stance .
Beyond this convention address, Rev. McCarthy demonstrated community involvement in other ways. He
maintained correspondence with Northern newspapers and Baptist organizations, keeping them informed
of conditions for freedpeople in Richmond. In fact, he developed a reputation (in the eyes of
unreconstructed Southerners) as a whistleblower on Southern racial issues. He wrote letters to the
Northern press under the self-described title “the only loyal minister south of the Potomac,” reporting
14
on the attitudes of ex-Confederates and advocating Northern intervention on behalf of freedmen .
Southern observers derisively called these “slanderous letters”, but they show McCarthy’s commitment to
14
speaking out for justice even at personal cost .
Within Pine Street Baptist Church, McCarthy likely pushed for the congregation to be welcoming toward
African Americans. It is documented that in 1867 the Pine Street membership split amidst internal
disagreement – by all indications, the split was over the church’s direction in the Reconstruction era and
McCarthy’s progressive views. One contemporary source confirms that some members strongly opposed
McCarthy’s stance toward black equality and the involvement of Northern Baptist societies, resulting
in a faction leaving in 1867 4
. Essentially, Rev. McCarthy’s advocacy created a rift: a portion of Pine Street’s
2
white members could not accept their pastor’s alignment with African Americans’ cause, while others
supported him (or at least the stability provided by Northern funding). This schism in 1867 profoundly
affected Pine Street – it tested whether a Southern church could embrace an activist, interracial ministry
during Reconstruction.
Conflict with Southern Baptist Leaders
Not surprisingly, Rev. McCarthy’s bold actions drew fierce criticism from the white Southern Baptist
establishment. His 1866 speech and writings were condemned in the Richmond press and by fellow
ministers. Dr. J. B. Jeter, a senior Virginia Baptist leader, stood up immediately after McCarthy’s convention
remarks to rebuke him for bringing politics into a religious meeting 15
. Jeter, while professing friendship
to the “colored race,” made clear that he found McCarthy’s radical politics “pernicious” in a church setting
15
. Other white Baptist clergymen, like Rev. A. E. Dickinson, likewise distanced themselves, stressing that
16
the Baptist focus should be on the religious education of freedpeople, not political agitation .
By June 1866, the Baptist General Association of Virginia (the statewide Southern Baptist body) took
action against McCarthy. At their annual meeting, they removed him from any positions on Baptist
boards and effectively ostracized him from leadership circles 17
. A Richmond paper noted that “he has
not for some time past been held in much regard by the Baptists of Virginia” and that if his equality
speech had come earlier, “he would doubtless have been denied membership in [the General
Association]” altogether 17
. In short, McCarthy was cast out by his peers – seen as a traitor to Southern
Baptist tradition. Some even questioned his sanity, calling him “crazy” for flip-flopping from a Confederate
4
chaplain to a Radical Republican preacher .
Within Pine Street Church, this external censure amplified tensions. The membership rift of 1867 led to
McCarthy’s departure from the pastorate that year. Pine Street Baptist, after losing its controversial pastor,
returned to a more traditional path. (By the 1870s the church was firmly back under native Virginia
leadership and later known for pastors like Rev. Joshua B. Hutson, who served by 1914 18
.) But for a brief
period under Rev. Florance McCarthy, Pine Street had stood at the forefront of social change –
experiencing, from within, the convulsions of Reconstruction.
Aftermath and Legacy
After leaving Pine Street in 1867, McCarthy’s life took new turns. He pursued further theological education,
enrolling at Richmond College (now the University of Richmond) through 1867 and then attending
Rochester Theological Seminary in New York, where he graduated in 1869 19
. In effect, he transitioned
fully into the Northern Baptist orbit. McCarthy went on to pastor in Middletown, New York (1869–1871)
and later in Chicago, Illinois (1871–1874) 20
. His outspoken nature, however, continued to court
controversy. In Chicago, a council of Baptist churches even withdrew his ministerial fellowship in 1874 –
an event suggesting further disputes or unorthodox views 21
. (He was eventually reinstated via a local
church re-ordination, but by the mid-1870s he shifted away from full-time ministry 22
.) Settling in Chicago,
22
McCarthy lived out his later years in business pursuits and faded from the public religious spotlight .
Despite this rather quiet ending, Rev. Florance McCarthy’s legacy in Richmond is significant. During his
brief pastorate at Pine Street Baptist Church (c.1865–1867), he emerged as a rare white Southern clergyman
who actively championed African Americans’ rights in the immediate post-Civil War period. He leveraged his
position to build bridges – speaking at black Baptist conventions, collaborating with Northern mission
3
agencies, and advocating for racial equality from the pulpit. Historian accounts note that his “platform”
was one he was “prepared to live and die by,” regardless of the personal consequences 11
. In the
historical context of Pine Street Baptist Church, this period stands out as a time when the church
became a flashpoint of Reconstruction-era change. The congregation’s struggles mirrored the South’s
struggles: old guard vs. new ideas, prejudice vs. progress.
McCarthy’s work with African American communities – though cut short – planted seeds. He helped affirm
for black Baptists that some white ministers would support their equality. And he confronted white Baptists
with the moral challenge of Reconstruction. While many of his contemporaries shunned him, later
generations can recognize Rev. Florance McCarthy as a man ahead of his time. His biography is a vivid
illustration of ministry intertwined with social justice: in Reconstruction Richmond, McCarthy used his
ministry to fight for “the least of these,” leaving an indelible if controversial mark on Pine Street Baptist
23 10
Church and the community it served .
Sources
• 5
Pine Street Baptist Church (Richmond, VA) – Church History webpage
• 3
Virginia Museum of History & Culture – McCarthy Family Papers, summary

Richmond Dispatch (via Savannah Daily News reprint, Aug. 27, 1866) – Report on Rev. McCarthy’s
speech and Baptist Convention incident
9 10

Valley Virginian (Staunton, Aug. 29, 1866) – Editorial on McCarthy (“only loyal preacher” and Southern
reaction)
4

Rochester Theological Seminary General Catalogue 1850–1910 – Entry for Florence McCarthy (birth,
education, pastorates)
24 25
• 2
Gale Baptist History & Heritage (2020) – Background on McCarthy family in Richmond
(contextual)

American Baptist Home Mission archival references – (Appointment of McCarthy and C.H. Corey to
6 26
Richmond) .

Pine Street ‘Heights’

This photo is of the eastern side of the 100 block of S.Pine Street. You can see on the northern end where a row house was sacrificed for an apartment building’s parking lot, but the remaining historic houses have been beautifully renovated.

Sadly, this block was separated from the rest of “the Hill” by the construction of 195, but it is still considered part of Oregon Hill neighborhood. Some wryly refer to the area north of the expressway as “the Oregon Hill Heights”.

What’s even sadder is the the City’s own Planning Commission has recently drawn its new ‘pattern book’ for the neighborhood without including “the Heights”, challenging the neighborhood’s defined borders and angering many residents.

This is seen as part of a long campaign to do away with this historic neighborhood, even if it means gradually chipping away, decade after decade. It’s the long battle of preservation.

Valentine-sponsored Walking Tours in April

The Valentine museum will be offering two Oregon Hill walking tours in April to explore the history of the neighborhood. They would love to have residents join us, share their stories, and learn some history! Tour tickets are $20 ($10 for Valentine members) and are now on sale via the museum website:
April 13th at 10am — History Hounds Explore Oregon Hill Walking Tour – The Valentine Museum (dog-friendly tour in collaboration with the SPCA)
April 19th at 10am — History of Oregon Hill Walking Tour – The Valentine Museum
All tours will begin at St. Andrews Episcopal Church.

On May 19th: Homecoming on the Hill: A Historic Look at Oregon Hill from 1800 – 1960s

The Valentine museum is making a presentation at the Pine St.Church on May 19th regarding the history of the Oregon Hill neighborhood.

Homecoming on the Hill:
A Historic Look at Oregon Hill from 1800 – 1960s

Oregon Hill residents, past and present, are invited to join us for food, fellowship and fond memories. This event is geared to residents 60 -100+ years of age, but all are welcome.

Event Timing: May 19, 2024 | Worship 11am | Lunch and Program 12:30-3:00pm

Event Address: Pine St. Baptist Church | 400 S. Pine St. Richmond, VA 23220

Contact us at 804-644-0339.
Presentation from The Valentine Starts at 1 pm in the fellowship Hill – use Albemarle St entrance