5th District Meeting Tonight

From email announcement:

Dear Neighbors:

Please join us tomorrow Wednesday, August 13th for our 5th District Meeting at Randolph Community Center-1415 Grayland Ave. Meeting topics include an update on the Idlewood roundabout project, remarks from City Council President Charles Samuels, back to school updates from Richmond Public Schools administrators and Councilman Agelasto’s legislative updates. We will also be collecting school supplies for needy families within the 5th District, please see the attached flyer for requested items. We look forward to seeing you tomorrow.

Sincerely,

Ida Jones
5th District Council Liaison

161

Rental Property Inspection Program Proposed For City

Excerpts from Richmond Times Dispatch article:

The city of Richmond is considering the creation an inspection program for rental properties in old areas of the city, a policy that could have a major impact on the 56 percent of city housing occupied by renters.
The rental inspections would apply in special districts created by the city with a high volume of renters and a risk of blight. As envisioned, the program would focus on student-heavy historic neighborhoods such as the Fan District, Oregon Hill, Jackson Ward and Carver, but the exact districts would be drawn later by city officials.

Landlords would likely have to pay a fee for each dwelling unit, but the precise dollar amount won’t be known until the city decides to move forward with an ordinance to start the program.
“This program will allow the city to work with property owners to make sure that that old housing is maintained at a higher level so that we don’t have additional blight coming through,” 5th District City Councilman Parker C. Agelasto said.

A survey conducted by the Virginia Municipal League last year found that 22 Virginia localities have rental inspection programs, including Petersburg, Hopewell, Colonial Heights, Virginia Beach, Hampton, Williamsburg, Lynchburg, Roanoke and Fredericksburg.
Agelasto explained the idea Tuesday at a meeting of the council’s Land Use, Housing and Transportation Committee. He characterized it as a way to protect renters from landlords who are reluctant to spend money to keep up their properties.
“The combination of old housing and young renters can sometimes be a recipe for disaster,” Agelasto said. Having working smoke alarms, he added, is important “when you live in a 100-year-old, wood-clapboard house.”

TD Headline: “City weighs anti-littering campaign ahead of 2015 bike race”

From Times Dispatch article:

Agelasto’s resolution would ask the administration of Mayor Dwight C. Jones to develop an anti-litter campaign and conduct an “inventory and assessment of existing policies and budget resources within the city to address littering concerns.”
Agelasto pointed specifically to the issue of illegal dumping, saying the city is having to pick up twice as much as it did six years ago. He called dumping a problem that’s “getting out of control.”

Iconically Wrong

On the City Council agenda for July 14th is a proposed 16 story tower on Pear Street proposed by felon Louis Salomonsky and his business partners. The city’s Master Plan, developed with thousands of volunteer hours, insists that the city’s views be protected, and certainly a 16 story tower would block the view of the river from Church Hill.

The Historic Richmond Foundation sent a disturbing letter suggesting that an “iconic” building is needed at that location.

Well, here is the type of “iconic” building at 709 W. Cary that Salomonsky and his business partners threw up in the Oregon Hill Historic District.

Image.ashx

Is Venture Richmond Above The Law?

Do the City’s rules and regulations do not apply equally to everyone? If the Mayor happens to be the president of your organization, as is the case with Venture Richmond, do the City’s regulations apply equally?

20140704_184507_resized

As of Monday, July 7th, why is there no permit on the city’s web site shown for Venture Richmond’s ongoing amphitheater work on the City-owned property leased by Venture Richmond (the area above the canal)? While it appears that no permit was requested or issued for the City parcel, a City employee indicated that the City parcel work was included in the permit that was issued. But is this correct procedure?

city property W0000051010 at Tredegar Green

In October 2012, the century-old Tredegar wall was illegally demolished on this same City property leased by Venture Richmond. Last week, silt fencing to stop erosion was not installed on the Venture Richmond property until after the public complained. As a result, dirt and debris was pushed into the wetlands.

Venture Richmond repeatedly promised a thorough Section 106 historic review of the impact that the amphitheater would have on the historic James River and Kanawha Canal, but the day after receiving final City Planning Commission approval, Venture Richmond broke this promise and withdrew from the Section 106 review.

Let’s hope that the public remembers Venture Richmond’s broken promises when the Shockoe stadium again rears its ugly head!

Tonight’s Fireworks Postponed To Saturday Evening Due To Weather

From Times Dispatch article:

RVA Fireworks on the James has been postponed from Thursday night until Saturday due to predictions of poor weather, the city of Richmond announced this afternoon.
The entertainment and fireworks festival has been held in and around Brown’s Island on the Fourth of July eve for several years. Because of the postponement, it will be held Saturday evening with the fireworks expected to start about 9:15 p.m.

This means police measures for the neighborhood are postponed to Saturday also.

OHNA Letter On Proposed Cherry Street Zoning Variance

From email to the City’s Board of Zoning Appeals:

Dear Board Members,

At the June 24, 2014 meeting of the Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association (OHNA), the neighborhood voted unanimously to oppose the application for zoning variance for the proposed new house at 423 S. Cherry Street (BZA Case No. 15-14).

The minimum side yard setback of three feet as required by Section 114-413.6 of the city zoning ordinance for the neighborhood’s R-7 zoning is not met. We note that, although it may be a lot of record, the 423 S. Cherry Street lot size of 1,161 sq. feet is less than a third of the minimum lot size of 3,600 sq. feet that is required by Section 114-413.5 of the zoning ordinance.

The proposed developer of 423 S. Cherry Street cannot show a hardship because he does not own the property. Also, the proposed developer stated, at a meeting with the neighborhood association to present his plans, that it would be possible to build an eleven-foot wide house meeting the setback requirements of the city zoning code. The owner of the property cannot show a hardship because he purchased the lot in 2003 without any improvements and with full knowledge of the lot’s limitations. The owner purchased this lot along with many other lots for $414,500 from the owner of Victory Rug. The current owner is an experienced developer and has advertised this lot for sale on Zillow as a lot that “does not meet city size requirements for a home.”

The lack of the required three foot minimum side setback would cause a hardship for the owners of the homes on the 800 block of Spring Street. These property owners purchased their homes with the understanding that the city’s zoning ordinance would be enforced and that a house would not be built within inches of their rear property line. It is worth noting that a total of four properties on the 800 block of Spring Street are under a preservation easement in perpetuity through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. Two of these properties protected by a preservation easement would be affected by the building of a new house at 423 S. Cherry Street.

A new house built within inches of the rear property line of the four houses on Spring Street would potentially cause serious drainage and fire access issues. There is no rear alley access to the property at 423 S. Cherry Street, and without a side setback there would be no access to the rear of the houses on the 800 block of Spring Street. The 1905 Sanborn Insurance map shows a house that previously existed at 423 S. Cherry Street with a side setback of several feet between the former house and the rear lot line of the houses on the 800 block of Spring Street.

The initial design for the proposed house at 423 S. Cherry Street that the neighborhood association received is not sensitive to the design features found in the Oregon Hill Historic District, which is listed on the state and national registers. The one centrally located window upstairs does not correspond with the two-bay design of the door and window apertures of the downstairs of the house. The materials shown in the plans of the house, such as the asphalt shingles on the front porch roof, are not what we would expect to find in an historically sensitive architectural plan. We would encourage the potential developer of this property to reconsider his proposed design.

The developer, at the time of his presentation to the neighborhood association, had not considered where the supercans would be stored if the house is built. It appears that the house at 423 S. Cherry Street and the four houses on Spring Street that back up to this property would have to permanently keep the unsightly supercans in front of each dwelling.

In summary, please deny approval of BZA Case No. 15-14. We do not believe that the owners who have restored their homes should be forced to experience a hardship in order that the developer can build a house without the required setbacks.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Hancock, President
Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association (OHNA)
June 25, 2014

The Board of Zoning Appeals is meeting July 2nd at 1 pm.

E-ZPass Program Ends Monthly Fee

Call me old-fashioned, but I still pay the 195 tolls with coins. However, for those that do use E-ZPass, the monthly fees for it will end:

Dear Valued E-ZPass Virginia Customer,

I am pleased to inform you that as of July 1, 2014, Virginia’s E-ZPass program will no longer charge a monthly maintenance fee on transponders. In April 2014, Governor McAuliffe signed legislation that required the elimination of the monthly maintenance fees by September 1, 2014. At the Governor’s direction, we are implementing this change two months early.

In the coming days, you will receive more details regarding the terms and conditions of Virginia’s E-ZPass program. We will continue to look for opportunities to improve the program and appreciate your participation in E-ZPass Virginia.

www.ezpassva.com
This email was sent from customerservice@ezpassva.com

Time to Revisit Dreams of High Speed Rail?

Riffing off a post from three years ago, will we see a resurgence in high speed rail hopes?

This past Friday, FRA Administrator Joseph Szabo spoke Friday at a Virginians for High-Speed Rail event in Richmond.

Szabo challenged officials in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia to develop a plan for service along the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor between Washington, D.C., and Atlanta.

And, tomorrow, there is an opportunity to advocate for better transportation. On Tuesday, June 24 from 12 noon to 6 pm, there is a PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE meeting of the Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization at 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23235. Planning staff from the MPO will be present at the meeting to explain the draft FY 12 – FY 15 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) document and to answer questions. The draft TIP document, still subject to review, is posted on the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission website, www.richmondregional.org.